Connect with us

Breaking News

Judge cancels court deadlines in Trump’s 2020 election case after his presidential win

Published

on

Judge cancels court deadlines in Trump’s 2020 election case after his presidential win

The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case canceled any remaining court deadlines while prosecutors assess the “the appropriate course going forward” in light of the Republican’s presidential victory. FIle photo
| Photo Credit: KEVIN WURM

WASHINGTON

The judge presiding over the case of Donald Trump’s alleged interference in the 2020 election has decided to put a halt on all remaining court deadlines. This decision comes as prosecutors evaluate the best way to proceed in light of Trump’s recent presidential win.

Special Counsel Jack Smith had previously charged Trump with attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election and unlawfully retaining classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate. However, with Trump’s victory, the Justice Department is now considering the implications of prosecuting a sitting president, as per longstanding department policy.

Trump’s criticism of the cases as politically motivated, along with his impending presidency, has led to a reevaluation of the legal proceedings. Smith’s team has requested additional time to assess the situation and determine the next steps in accordance with Department of Justice guidelines.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has granted the request to suspend court deadlines and has asked prosecutors to submit their proposed plan for the case by December 2.

Meanwhile, Trump’s trial scheduled for March in Washington has been put on hold as he asserts his immunity from prosecution, a claim that was recently upheld by the Supreme Court. The court has sent the case back to Judge Chutkan for further review.

In a separate case involving the hoarding of classified documents, the proceedings have been stalled since July due to a dismissal on the grounds of Smith’s appointment. Despite efforts to revive the case, the legality of Smith’s appointment remains a point of contention.

Trending