New Snailload Attack Demonstrates Exposed User Activities

Researchers recently uncovered a new attack method called the “Snailload attack” that exposes users’ online activities to potential eavesdroppers. This attack technique capitalizes on network latency issues that arise from bottlenecks in internet connections.

Snailload Attack Exploits Network Latency

A team of researchers from Graz University of Technology has developed a side-channel attack known as the Snailload attack, which allows adversaries to monitor users’ online actions. This attack leverages network latency to spy on unsuspecting users.

Unlike traditional interference methods that require attackers to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attacks or sniff WiFi packets in close proximity to the target network, the Snailload attack does not necessitate code execution or physical access to the network.

The Snailload attack takes advantage of internet connection bottlenecks, particularly between users’ devices and Internet Service Providers (ISPs), affecting network latency. By exploiting this bottleneck, attackers can intercept data packets without the need for malware execution or WiFi packet sniffing.

In this attack scenario, the victim unknowingly downloads a file (such as an image or video) from the attacker’s server, with the attack concealing the file or video download. By sending the file gradually, the attacker can exploit the bottleneck to measure network latency and discern the content being accessed. This slow delivery of the file, resembling a snail’s pace, leaves detectable traces, hence the name “Snailload.”

The researchers have detailed the technical aspects of the attack in their research paper and provided a demonstration on a dedicated website, along with releasing the example server on GitHub.

Limitations And Countermeasures

The Snailload attack is a precise remote side-channel attack that does not require reliance on the victim machine’s hardware or code execution. Its passive traffic analysis approach makes it applicable to any network-connected device.

Despite its effectiveness in packet tracing, the Snailload attack has limitations, primarily working on TCP connections where measuring network latency is feasible.

Countermeasures against the Snailload attack include introducing noise to disrupt the attack, although this may inconvenience users. Additionally, the attack requires the target network to have a higher bandwidth at the backbone infrastructure compared to the user’s connection to create an effective bottleneck.

We welcome your thoughts and feedback in the comments section.