A Fractured Supreme Court’s Decisions Remade America in 2024

Former President Donald J. Trump had a successful year at the Supreme Court, with several rulings in his favor. The court granted him substantial immunity from prosecution related to allegations of election interference in 2020. Additionally, the court cast doubt on two charges against him in an ongoing prosecution. In March, the justices allowed him to pursue another term despite a constitutional provision barring insurrectionists from holding office.

On the other hand, administrative agencies faced setbacks in the court, with several rulings erasing foundational precedents and challenging agency expertise. The court itself took on a variety of major disputes, shaping American society and democracy. Despite some criticism and backlash, the court continued to play a significant role in key issues.

The court’s decisions were often divided along partisan lines, particularly in cases involving Mr. Trump’s immunity, agency power, homelessness, voting rights, guns, and public corruption. The justices’ voting patterns highlighted the ideological divide on the court, with significant differences in opinions and rationales.

The term revealed a high level of polarization on the court, with Democratic appointees more likely to vote for liberal results compared to Republican ones. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. faced scrutiny for his opinions, particularly in cases related to abortion rights. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh emerged as a key figure in the court, consistently being in the majority in cases since joining in 2018.

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch stood out for his independence and willingness to side with liberal results in some cases. The dynamics among the justices, especially on the conservative wing, showcased disagreements and potential shifts in ideology. The upcoming term will likely bring further challenges and contentious issues before the court.

As the court navigates future cases, the balance of power and ideological differences among the justices will continue to shape its decisions. The court’s role in key issues such as transgender care for minors and ghost guns remains uncertain, with little expectation of consensus. The ongoing disagreements among the justices reflect a complex and dynamic environment within the highest court in the land.