Gadgets

The iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge’s biggest compromises make them a no-go for me

Published

14 hours ago

May 12, 2025

Empowerment

The iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge's biggest compromises make them a no-go for me

Summary

Both the iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge are expected to compromise on battery life in exchange for thinness.

That’s a step backwards, considering that no one is asking for thinner phones, yet people are always asking for more runtime.

It may be that the phones are a necessary step towards a better future, but as rumored, they won’t be getting my money.

It feels like

iPhone 17
rumors are hitting non-stop these days, which makes sense — we’re about four months out from launch, so hardware details need to be locked down ahead of mass production. It takes quite a while to churn out the millions of units Apple needs to satisfy worldwide launch demand.

The latest rumor (via The Information), is that in order to achieve its ultra-thin 5.5mm body, the

iPhone 17 Air
will sport a serious compromise in battery life. How much? Allegedly, Apple’s internal testing suggests that just 60 to 70% of owners will be able to make it a full day on a single charge, down from about 80 to 90% for other iPhone models. The company is even said to be preparing a new battery case, something it hasn’t offered since the discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.

Similar rumors have emerged around Samsung’s

Galaxy S25 Edge
. According to WinFuture, the phone may have a 3,900mAh battery — that’s more capacity than the iPhone 16, but below the regular S25’s 4,000mAh, and much less than the S25 Ultra’s 5,000mAh. That’s put me off both Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” phones, and not just because everyone prefers higher numbers.

data-modal-id=”single-image-modal” data-modal-container-id=”single-image-modal-container” data-img-caption=”""”>

Is the iPhone 15 still worth buying in 2025? The answer is complicated

Possibly, but you shouldn’t get one straight from Apple.

Coping with the status quo

As a tech journalist, I might be an exception, but I find that most phones still don’t have enough battery life, never mind rolling things back. My current daily driver is an iPhone 16 Pro, which according to Apple, should be capable of up to 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds impressive, right? In practice, however, I’m struggling to think of how that could be possible. I like to put on Reuters’ video briefing while I shower and change in the morning, and I’ll sometimes see the battery drop to 90% or lower before I even get downstairs for breakfast. On workout days, it’s possible for the battery to dip below 30% by the time I get into bed, and that’s after a 15- to 16-hour day of mostly non-video activity. If I actually spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I’d probably have to put my phone in Low Power Mode at some point.

This year, it seems like both Apple and Samsung are working on the assumption that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake.

I’d say it’s baffling that Apple and Samsung appear to be headed in the wrong direction, but really, it’s not. Both companies have long put other upgrades ahead of battery life. It is, in theory, possible to make it over a day if you’ve got a phone like the Galaxy S25 Ultra or iPhone 16 Pro Max, but only with light usage. Indeed, battery life has always played second fiddle for most smartphone makers, simply because bigger batteries are expensive while being tough to exploit in marketing campaigns. A 6.9-inch screen or a 10X telephoto lens is immediately impressive — it’s harder to wow people with an extra two or three hours of runtime.

This year, it seems like both Apple and Samsung are working on the assumption that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It’s going to attract some people, certainly, but we’re not in the 2000s anymore — phones have been thin for a long time. No one I know is complaining about thickness. If anything, the issue seems to be that phones have become unwieldy, getting thinner while simultaneously growing taller, wider, and slipperier. Metal and glass may be nice aesthetically — but without a case, thin devices like my iPhone and my wife’s OnePlus 9 5G feel like they could slip out of my hands with one wrong gesture.

data-modal-id=”single-image-modal” data-modal-container-id=”single-image-modal-container” data-img-caption=”""”>